Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

arXiv blog

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Email Subscription

Recently on the arXiv blog...

Recent comments on the arXivblog

  • lkrndu : Uh - spudnik??
  • ... : Not electron movement - lithium ions
  • garylynn : I humbly suggest that we need a catchier "techincal" term for the potato-shaped asteroids.  Might...
  • ZephirAWT : The problem is not in the small wavelength, but in huge capacitance of electrodes, which are...
  • microgold : I think he was making a pun on the word peak for battery charging, so I suspect this was done on...
  • Reptile : Haven't read the article, but sounds interesting.  Giga hertz?  And does it go through a...
  • rkomatsu : Perhaps they could apply a combination of frequencies instead. The article says they will study...
  • rkomatsu : The 25GHz frequency is arbitrary. In the conclusion of the article, they say "future work will...
  • ... : The exponential rate versus voltage reminds me of tunneling behavior. The use of 25 GHz doesn't...
  • ryuuguu : So you tried this with a few batteries? Or is this just another theory like the one your...
  • ncm : I think you are misunderstanding the method.  The average and instantaneous field produces force...
  • monettsys : I agree with Uncle Al. Trying to apply a 25GHz signal to a battery is impractical. The wavelength...
  • Phineas : Its a paradox To employ a pair of docs Ah so desu ka
  • ncm : (The article uses "exponential" twice.  The first use is nonsense.  Such usage has become common...
  • UncleAl : The simulations were performed on 2.6 GHz Opteron processors, using 160 processors at a time. The...
  • flared0ne : If I remember correctly, aren't there some indications that there are micro-tubule structures in...
  • ... : I believe that soon, by the will of Allah, atomic teleportation will become a reality.The Qur'an...
  • ciantic : Interesting, if that truly is the case I do not understand why it is classified as quantum...
  • literalman : See http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/peaked.html for an explanation.Otherwise, fascinating article!
  • vigna : Well, actually Leontief's theory just shows how to define a sustainable economy through the...
Advertisement
Sunday, February 07, 2010

The Mobile Phone Conundrum: If I Call You, Will You Call Back?

The study of reciprocity between mobile phone users reveals surprising insights about the flow of information in society.

What do your mobile phone habits say about you? Probably more than you might imagine.

At least, that's the suggestion from Lauri Kovanen and pals at the Aalto University School of Science and Technology, Finland. These guys have studied the 350 million calls made by 5.3 million customers over an unnamed mobile phone network during a period of 18 weeks. The primary question they ask is whether mobile phone calls are mutually reciprocated: in other words, does somebody who calls another individual receive in return as many calls as he or she makes, a phenomenon known as reciprocity.

Mobile phone calls are a particularly good way to study reciprocity because they are directed in a way that sms messages and email are not. In a mobile phone call, the caller initiates the conversation and then both parties invest a certain amount of time in the event. But afterwards there is usually no immediate reason for the recipient to call back. So it's clear who initiated the event.

But SMS messages or e-mails are entirely different: here a conversation usually means sending a sequence of reciprocated messages and this makes it much more difficult to study reciprocity by simply counting the number of messages.

This has allowed Kovanen and company to unearth a number of interesting phenomena. For a start, the calling patterns of prepaid users is very different from those with a contract who pay later. Postpaid users tend to be more prolific, having on average 5.41 people they call.

Prepaid users, by contrast, have only 3.41 contacts on average (although the notion of "average" is a little strange here since there is a very long tail on these distributions).

Not only that but postpaid users make 10 times as many calls as prepaid users. "We can also see that prepaid users receive more calls than they make, while the most active postpaid users make more calls than they receive," says Kovanen and company.

Prepaid users are also have more skewed relationships. Among prepaid users, the relationships where one participant makes more than 80 percent of all calls make up over 25 percent of the total.

The figures for postpaid users are far less skewed but they are greater than you'd expect from an ordinary probabilistic distribution in which each party in a relationship was just as likely to call the other.

So what's the difference between prepaid and postpaid callers? One of the most important is probably that prepaid users are much more likely to be young people. And sociologists already know that relationships between young people tend not to be equally reciprocated.

A few years ago, the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health asked US students to name up to five of their best friends. Between them, the students named 7,000 individuals but only 35 percent of the nominations were reciprocated. So perhaps it's not suprising that a similar picture emerges from the study of mobile phone calls.

More puzzling is the skew in reciprocity in postpaid users which may not be as significant as for prepaid users but is still worthy of note.

What Kovanen and co are uncovering may be some fundamental property of human relationships; only more study will reveal that.

But the work is important for another reason: the skewed reciprocity between mobile phone users may influence other things such as the spread of ideas and information in society or, just as likely, the spread of viruses.

And that could have important implications for the way antivirus efforts are organised and directed.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1002.0763: Reciprocity of Mobile Phone Calls


Comments

  • Vice versa
    I believe the results are not only because of somebody being post-paid or pre-paid. It's partially true the other way round.

    People may start their mobile-relationship with any type of services (pre or post) but they eventually evolve to use one of the services as suited to their requirement and budget.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    shazl
    02/08/2010
    Posts:3
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Mobile Phone Conundrum
    The other issue that is being overlooked is the type of prepaid service, and how the cost impacts the user.
    The service I use has unlimited incoming calls for $10 per month. My outgoing calls are limited to 200 minutes, and cost $20.
    It's better for me to receive calls than to make them, so while it seems my communication may be one directional, it is often started by a text message saying: "call me please." People on landlines, or those who can afford better cell phone plans have no problem communicating with me.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    coolmike
    02/09/2010
    Posts:1
  • ¿Surprising results?
    For me, this results are obvious.

    No mention is made of the different operator charges applied to prepaid or postpaid users for initiating a conversation. 
    My experience in Spain is that prepaid contracts are better suited for users initiating few calls but wanting to be in touch with friends and family. For those users that plan to initiate a lot of calls, postpaid contracts offer much better fares.

    I'd expected the study to focus on age, gender, rural/urban areas, location or any other attribute closer to the user or his/her environment than the kind of contract with the mobile operator.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jprieto
    02/17/2010
    Posts:2

Log In

Advertisement
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology CyberMedia © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.