Physicists have come up with a way to process information faster than the speed of light. But what could they do with such a hypercomputer?
The speed of light represents one of the fundamental limits of the laws of physics. Nothing can travel faster than the speed of light, right?
Well, yes and no, say Volkmar Putz and Karl Svozil at the Vienna University of Technology in Austria. They say there are several ways that signals can cross the superluminal line, although none of them allow the kind of time travel paradoxes beloved of science fiction writers. For example, the quantum phenomenon of entanglement occurs when two quantum particles are described by the same wave function. These particles can be separated by the diameter of the universe and yet a measurement on one will instantaneously influence the other.
So-called "nonlocal" phenomenon cannot be used to transmit information faster than the speed of light but Putz and Svozil today ask whether it can be used to process it, to carry out computational tasks at superluminal speeds. They say there is no reason why not, provided the processing does not lead to any time travel paradoxes.
How might such a machine work? Putz and Svozil point out that nonlocal phenomenon can lead to materials in which the index of refraction is less than one, thereby allowing superluminal speeds. For example, light travelling through a vacuum can be made to spontaneously form into an electron-positron pair--an entangled pair--which then recombine to form a photon again. This process happens instantaneously, allowing the photon to effectively "jump" across space.
A material in which this kind of pair formation and recombination was promoted would have a refractive index less than one, they say. Various physicists have proposed such materials made of things like metamaterials. Putz and Svozil themselves suggest that a vacuum filled with either electrons or positrons would do the trick.
Having created a medium in which the refractive index is less than one, Putz and Svozil's idea is simply to immerse a computer in it. That simple act (and presumably some clever design to create an optical computer in the first place) would allow superluminal computation to take place.
Assuming that this device could actually be built, what could you do with a superluminal computer? That's a good question that Putz and Svozil do not address directly. They say such a device would fall into a class of processing machine known as hypercomputers. These are hypothetical devices more powerful than Turing machines, that allow non-Turing computations. They were first discussed by Alan Turing in the 1930s.
In theory, hypercomputers can compute certain kinds of otherwise noncomputable functions. That sounds handy but even though there are uncountably many non-computable functions, it's actually quite hard to come up with an example of one that might seem useful. If you have any ideas, post them in the comments section.
Otherwise sit back and wait for a new era of superluminal hyprcomputers. But don't hold your breath.
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1003.1238: On the physical limit of communication speed by light signals
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Comments
ZephirAWT
03/09/2010
Posts:277
IdeasManPhd
03/09/2010
Posts:1
I've been trying to come up some sort of analogy for the synchronized data output in quantum entanglement.
What I've understood (very little of details, but I think the big picture is this) when the entanglement takes place, some sort of synchronization between two things A and B happens.
After that, when one "flips a switch" in A out comes some sort of value, and supposedly when one does this same kind of flip to B, one gets same value back.
As an analogy: You have two* things that produces same random numbers each time called.
* Or more, since entanglement can be done to more things than two, but two is good for the example.
Thinking like this, the problem is much easier for me to grasp, but is my analogy anything right?
This would surely allow to "transmit data" using the random number generators. E.g. let's say getting first ~1MB of random data in A's end and then creating algorithm that stores information to this 1MB of random data. Now sending that algorithm using conventional information channels to B. In the B's end it could then ask for 1MB of data and use the transmitted algorithm to extract the "information stored in random data".
ciantic
03/09/2010
Posts:3
I looked at it in this light: if at point A in space you turn on a light switch, the light at point B in space will instantaneously turn on. There is no need for a transmission time between points A and B because of their quantum entanglement. I'm not sure how all of this could be translated into computing power, but computer logic is binary, so somehow that will translate from entanglement to computer processing.
I just watched a program the other night on the Science Channel where they were exploring the actual science behind certain science fiction technologies. This episode was on a teleporter and it described quantum entanglement. I wish I remembered the show's name or I had recorded it. Anyway, I hope this helped out.
ztatge
03/09/2010
Posts:1
"if at point A in space you turn on a light switch, the light at point B in space will instantaneously turn on."
If that is possible, one could morse-code over space with faster than speed of light, and that to my knowledge would be classical information channel faster than speed of light, which would break my interpretation.
What I've understood is that in point A of space you can ask for the value from particle. Afterwards when B asks for value from their particle they get the same result. This does not transmit any data over space, both only gets value that is determined upon asking from information that got synchronized.
Though I must admit that my random number generator interpretation requires the existence of hidden variable, that would act similarily as seed number in random number generator. This would be set to same value for A and B when entanglement happens.
We probably need more input from other people to get forward with these analogies. My analogy is not compatible with yours, and vice versa.
ciantic
03/10/2010
Posts:3
Measurement here could really be any interaction with the environment. For matter, a vacuum is needed to preserve the superposition. For light, the entangled photons can travel through a waveguide such as optical fiber and remain in superposition during transit.
As a side note, when this is used in quantum cryptography the measurement of entangled particles must be done synchronously at both ends of the encrypted channel. With tightly synced measurement at both ends, it is possible to detect an eavesdropper because the states would tend to be inequal as a result of the eavesdropper causing decoherence and being unable to successfully entangle another particle with the one left at the source. (However they will be equal 1/2 of the time by chance.) To be clear, no information travels faster than light in this scenario. The data rate is further limited by the maximum speed at which measurements can be kept in sync at both ends of the channel.
cypherpunks
06/15/2010
Posts:2
TimG
03/10/2010
Posts:12
Approaching Singularity at warp speed... LOL
flared0ne
03/10/2010
Posts:84
Unless the superluminal medium allows a rather impressive increase in data transmission speeds, it's unlikely to make any significant contribution to computing power.
Brett_Bellmo...
03/13/2010
Posts:1
To employ a pair of docs
Ah so desu ka
Phineas
03/10/2010
Posts:107
sgt101
03/17/2010
Posts:2
jim3rd
04/01/2010
Posts:1