Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

arXiv blog

The Physics arXiv Blog produces daily coverage of the best new ideas from an online forum called the Physics arXiv on which scientists post early versions of their latest ideas. Contact me at KentuckyFC @ arxivblog.com

Email Subscription

Recently on the arXiv blog...

Recent comments on the arXivblog

  • jjs : Precision of Mercury.  Bending of light around the sun and galaxies  Time contraction at high...
  • mattgroom : Its quite easy really. The earth is moving in a timeframe independent of the other galaxy which i...
  • mattgroom : You seem to think that you can side step a problem by changing the form of the problem?  That...
  • mattgroom : What if the background radiation that is quite frankly "a piece of a theory" is actually the...
  • AKT : This is as groundless as anything.   To make a statement like this, one should define what light...
  • AKT :    What physicists and pseud physicists do not understand is the difference between empirical...
  • AKT : It is naturally expected. In the last month, this blog has been right on the corruption of...
  • animea90 : Hey, I just signed up to point out that the speed of light is constant even in a material. What...
  • dave... : "One of the biggest problems he faces is explaining the existence and structure of the cosmic...
  • royboy2019 : "Some foolish men declare that a Creator made the world. The doctrine that the world was created...
  • AKT : Let me ask you a question. What do you mean by Quantum Mechanics?   Many physicists in main...
  • rsanchez1 : As for me, I eagerly await his explanation for the Cosmic Microwave Background. The big bang...
  • ... : I was drawn to this discussion from Kurzweilai.net by the fact that the subject relates to my own...
  • smoker : What happens when light is red shifted so far that it stops being a wave form altogetherThat...
  • mvardon : Am I missing something here or are we exerting significant energies on a 'paradox' based on a...
  • ZephirAWT : The Top 30 Problems with the Big Bang http://www.metaresearch.org/cosmology/BB-top-30.aspRecently...
  • ZephirAWT : Actually there exists a number of models involving periodic Universe, some the similar one was...
  • B. Honest : What you are describing is very similar to the subatomic quantum fluctuations, where particles...
  • B. Honest : If our 'Universe' is ruled by quantum mechanics I think that, like subatomic particles that...
  • Taymon : This is my only objection to an otherwise good and well-written article--but it is a very serious...
Advertisement
Friday, March 12, 2010

Orange Dwarf Star Set to Smash into The Solar System

A new set of star velocity data indicates that Gliese 710 has an 86 percent chance of ploughing into the Solar System within the next 1.5 million years.

The Solar System is surrounded by thousands of stars, but until recently it wasn't at all clear where they were all heading.

In 1997, however, astronomers published the Hipparcos Catalogue giving detailed position and velocity measurements of some 100,000 stars in our neighbourhood, all gathered by the European Space Agency's Hipparcos spacecraft. It's fair to say that the Hipparcos data has revolutionised our understanding of the 'hood.

In particular, this data allowed astronomers to work out which stars we'd been closer to in the past and which we will meet in the future. It turns out that 156 stars fall into this category and that the Sun has a close encounter with another star (meaning an approach within 1 parsec) every 2 million years or so.

In 2007, however, the Hipparcos data was revised and other measurements of star velocities have since become available. How do these numbers change the figures?

Today, Vadim Bobylev at the Pulkovo Astronomical Observatory in St Petersburg gives us the answer. He's combined the Hipparcos data with several new databases and found an additional nine stars that have either had a close encounter with the Sun or are going to.

But he's also made a spectacular prediction. The original Hipparcos data showed that an orange dwarf star called Gliese 710 is heading our way and will arrive sometime within the next 1.5 million years.

Of course, trajectories are difficult to calculate when the data is poor so nobody has really been sure about what's going to happen.

What the new data has allowed Bobylev to do is calculate the probability of Gliese 710 smashing into the Solar System. What he's found is a shock.

He says there is 86 percent chance that Gliese 710 will plough through the Oort Cloud of frozen stuff that extends some 0.5 parsecs into space.

That may sound like a graze but it is likely to have serious consequences. Such an approach would send an almighty shower of comets into the Solar System which will force us to keep our heads down for a while. And a probability of 86 percent is about as close to certainty as this kind of data can get.

The good news is that Bobylev says the chances of Gliese 710 penetrating further into the Solar System, inside the Kuiper Belt, are much smaller, just 1 in a 1000. So that's all right, then.

Keep calm and carry on.

Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1003.2160: Searching for Stars Closely Encountering with the Solar System

Comments

  • Does Gliese have an Oort Cloud?
    Does Gliese 710 have its own Oort Cloud? And by analogy will our Sun and inner solar system pass through its Oort cloud just as Gliese passes through ours? Does this indicate twice the threat?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Mark Bruce
    03/12/2010
    Posts:4
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    • Re: Does Gliese have an Oort Cloud?
      I agree, Mark, probably comets will be exchanged between both systems and that may bring a shower of comets into inner Solar System. It represents a nasty scenario in our remote future, indeed.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      ROCA
      03/12/2010
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      • Re: Does Gliese have an Oort Cloud?
        I'm of the opinion that really large objects, like stars, always move through space with a fairly large entourage of other objects. Assuming that Gliese 710 is of a similar mass and age as the Sun, then it would be safe to assume that it also has an Oort cloud extending roughly 0.5 parsec out.  Gliese's furthest Oort objects will begin to intersect the Sun's Oort object orbits far earlier than 1.5 million years.  Assume further that Gliese 710's motion is coincident with a much larger interstellar gas flow, then there is a risk for other planetary-like bodies to arrive earlier in that gas flow well ahead of Gliese 710's Oort cloud objects.
        Rate this comment: 12345

        rboblee
        03/18/2010
        Posts:5
        Avg Rating:
        3/5
  • Let's Move
    This only gives us one and a half million years to find new digs. Sooner is better.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Phineas
    03/13/2010
    Posts:107
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • 0,5 pc is still far
    Half a parsec is still 1,6 light years or 100 000 times the distance from Earth to Sun.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    eautio
    03/14/2010
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Article error: 1 in 10,000, isn't it?
    Doesn't the article say 1 in 10,000 (.0001) chance of it coming into our Kuiper Belt?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    ricklev
    03/15/2010
    Posts:7
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • Is Gliese 710 "Nemesis"?
    Has anyone tried to determine if the sun and Gliese 710 orbit each other as a binary star system?  If they do, has Nemesis finally been discovered?  Or, is there still something else out there waiting to be detected?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    TaubeArn
    03/15/2010
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • [no subject]
    I have no physics background, but the arxiv link says Gliese 710 has an 86% probability of impacting the Oort Cloud within the next 1.45 -+.06 million years, but a .0001 probability (1/10,000) that it will reach a region where its influence on Kuiper Belt objects becomes possible.

    But what's the probability of an Oort Cloud object displaced by GL 710 passing the Kuiper Belt (or displacing a Kuiper Belt object), and one of those objects impacting Earth?

    The arxiv link says they found 9 new candidates within 30 parsecs of the Sun, meaning "stars that either have encountered or will encounter the solar neighborhood within less than 3 pc in the time interval from -2 Myr to +2 Myr."

    This article says 156 stars have been closer in the past or we'll meet in the future. And that the Sun has a close encounter (within 1 parsec) every 2 million years or so.

    Glancing at the study preview, it says the formation time scale of a comet shower is  approx 1 Myr after the passage of a star. It says the frequency of stars coming within 1 pc of the Sun to be 11.7 plus or minus 1.3 encounters per million years. It says "156 Hipparcos stars from the solar neighborhood 50 pc in radius that either have encountered or will encounter with the Solar system within r<5pc in the time interval +10 Myr are known to date."

    Would it be possible to accurately associate certain stars with past mass extinctions on Earth? And shouldn't humans be developing vast underground living quarters on Earth before trying to colonize other planets?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    darkspeed
    03/18/2010
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re:
      Why does my comment merit one star? Because I noticed, along with someone else above, that this article incorrectly says 1/1000 and not 1/10,000 (.0001)? Or that I asked if a Oort Cloud object displaced by GL 710 may impact Earth? Or that I asked if nearby stars could feasibly be associated with previous mass extinctions?
      Rate this comment: 12345

      darkspeed
      03/19/2010
      Posts:2
      Avg Rating:
      3/5
  • re: darkspeed
    ya, forming underground quarters might be needed,
    for i hav read that many ancient underground tunnels, caves n caverns exist. They just might be formed by past civilizations to protect themselves frm (maybe hostile surface conditions??)

    http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/UFOs/tunnels.html

    read up! pretty interesting :)
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jus qrious
    04/23/2010
    Posts:1

Log In

Advertisement
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology CyberMedia © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.