Milky Way's Black Hole Flared During the Renaissance, Say Astronomers
The supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy must have emitted a massive X-ray flare several hundred years ago.
The Physics arXiv Blog 09/14/2011
- 15 Comments

For more than a decade, astronomers have studied several mysterious sources of X-rays near the centre of the Milky Way. The X-rays are a puzzle because they come from clouds that are not hot enough to produce them. That has left astrophysicists scratching their heads over the origin of these emissions.
One idea is that the emissions are echoes of X-rays from another, more powerful source that must have erupted earlier. And indeed various lines of evidence seem to support this. For example, a few years ago, scientists discovered that the X-rays were flickering in exactly the way you'd expect if the irregularly shaped clouds were being illuminated by another source.
But what could generate such a flare? The answer depends on the size of the original. If relatively small, then the culprit could be a binary system made up of an ordinary star and a white dwarf or neutron star, which are known to emit X-rays at intensities of up to 10^35 ergs.
But if the intensity of the original flare were much larger than this, there can be only one culprit: the supermassive black hole at the centre of the galaxy: Sagittarius A* or Sgr A* (pronounced Sagittarius A-star) .
Today, Masayoshi Nobukawa and buddies at Kyoto University in Japan provide the first unambiguous evidence that Sgr A* is the guilty party. They say they've measured the intensity of the X-rays from various different clouds over several years using the Suzaku orbiting X-ray telescope.
What they've found is interesting. The X-rays from these clouds are all dropping in exactly the same way albeit shifted in time by a few years. That can only be possible if the clouds at different distances were illuminated by the same X-ray flare as it fizzed out.
Nobukawa and co also calculate the brightness of this original flare at more than 10^39 ergs, more than any ordinary star or binary system could produce.
Their conclusion is that Sgr A* must be responsible. This flare would have bathed us in X-rays some time ago but the echo from the molecular clouds is reaching us only now.
This echo also allows astronomers to work out when the supermassive black hole erupted. All they have to do is measure the clouds' distances in light years from the galactic centre.
It turns out that these molecular clouds are only a few hundred light years from Sgr A*, which means that the supermassive black hole must have erupted during the Renaissance period (roughly from the 14th-17th centuries).
That's a neat bit of astronomy, which raises an interesting question. Astronomers can see today that Sgr A* emits X-rays with an intensity of about 10^34 ergs and constantly emits small flares. It would be only natural to think that if this object has emitted big flares in the recent past, it will repeat the performance in the near future.
But even if that happens, astronomers might still have to wait for some echoes to study it in detail. Our view of Sgr A* is so badly obscured that most of any light coming our way is lost.
Ref: arxiv.org/abs/1109.1950: New Evidence For High Activity Of The Super-Massive Black Hole In Our Galaxy

ZephirX
250 Comments
Black hole flare
The theory of galactic flares was presented with famous French astrophysicist Paul LaViolette in his thesis and attacked with most of people like the Mark Morris dismissed the idea as having no merit... However, in 1998 after ten years of observation, Morris was quoted as saying that the center of our Galaxy explodes about every 10,000 years with these events each lasting 100 years or so.
http://arxiv.org/ftp/physics/papers/0503/0503158.pdf
IMO this flare is the reason of the contemporary period of global warming and elevated geovolcanic activity. It contain a lotta antimatter in form of neutrinos, which annihilate in contact with matter (which is considered as an evidence of "WIMPS") and accelerate the decay of radioactive elements at the Earth mantle.
http://aetherwavetheory.blogspot.com/2010/12/global-warming-and-galactic-superwaves.html
BTW Do you know, the 2012 movie (where this mechanism has been outlined too) has been called "the most nonscientific movie ever" with NASA?
http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-01-nasa-silly-sci-fi-flawed.html
Reply
CharlieW
3 Comments
Re: Black hole flare
"... the reason of the contemporary period of global warming..."
That certainly seems more likely then 390 ppm CO2. IMO it's fairy flatulence.
Reply
ZephirX
250 Comments
Re: Black hole flare
It's actually as likely, but it doesn't explain the global warming changes at the other planets of solar system, the changes in geovolcanic activity and the ocean heat content anomaly.
IMO the global warming can be the common result of both anthropogenic, both astrophysical factors without problem. I presume, the humans are primarily responsible for droughts, the astrophysics for temperature increasing. There is no reason to connect both these aspects together: we could have "wet global warming" in the same way, like the dry one.
Reply
lucyhaye
77 Comments
Neutrinos Non-Existence
I am so sorry to tell you this but Dr. Carezani in his New Paradigm in Physics-Cosmology proves, without any doubt, that the Neutrino doesn’t exist.
Please see
http://autodynamicslborg.blogspot.com/2011/06/never-any-detector-detected-any.html
Lucy Haye Ph. D.
SAA’s representative.
lucyhaye22@gmail.com
Reply
lucyhaye
77 Comments
No Neutrinos
I am so sorry to tell you this but Dr. Carezani in his New Paradigm in Physics-Cosmology proves, without any doubt, that the Neutrino doesn’t exist.
Please see
http://autodynamicslborg.blogspot.com/2011/06/never-any-detector-detected-any.html
Lucy Haye Ph. D.
SAA’s representative.
lucyhaye22@gmail.com
Reply