Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

TR Editors' blog

Insights, opinions, and our editors' analysis of the latest in emerging technologies.

Blog Topics

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • rkomatsu : I found the article easily in Nature Neuroscience with a search engine. Fortunately, Nature gives...
  • rgrem : Great work!  You suggested reading the original article.  Can you provide a URL?  ADHD literature...
  • ... : Checked out the video, looks like a derivative of Pranav Mistry's Sixth sense technology.
  • digger : Thank you for the good work you have done.  I'm very interested in learning more about neural...
  • digger : Archie, I'm sorry you feel the way you do about the use of Ritalin for the treatment of ADHD.  I...
Advertisement
Wednesday, January 27, 2010

Will the iPad Kill the Kindle?

The price and specs suggest that Apple's device will offer stiff competition.
By Erica Naone

It's not yet clear whether the iPad will live up to the breathless excitement that surrounded its launch. But, from the specs alone, it clearly spells trouble for dedicated e-readers, particularly Amazon's larger version of the Kindle.

The Kindle DX is the same size as the iPad. It has a black and white E-Ink screen, four gigabytes of internal storage, 3G access and costs $489. Meanwhile, the cheapest version of the iPad has a full-color touch screen, a powerful processor and graphics chip, 16 gigabytes of flash storage, Wi-Fi and sells for $499.

The cheaper iPad might not have 3G or the same battery life as the Kindle DX (up to four days), but on every other count it wins. It has both a gorgeous screen and vastly more functionality. And, while Amazon has established an excellent, easy way to buy books, iTunes, which already has some 125 million customers, will give it a run for its money.

During today's launch, Apple played down its move into the e-reader market--the iBooks demo was buried in-between game demonstrations and a long explanation of the company's productivity software. But the iPad price point means that those considering a dedicated e-reader will be sorely tempted by an iPad. In addition, because an iTunes account can be used to purchase e-books, Apple stands to capture a large audience of users readers who want to read a few e-books but would never buy a dedicated device.

The iBooks app also has access to the full catalogs of five major publishers: Penguin, HarperCollins, Simon & Schuster, Macmillan, and Hachette Book Group. It also uses the standard ePub format, meaning that books purchased on this device will be compatible with other readers.

Comments

  • ePub
    "It also uses the standard ePub format, meaning that books purchased on this device will be compatible with other readers."

    Umm, no, epub specifies the format but not the DRM standard. Good luck on a sony bookstore purchase working on this.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    rturpen
    01/27/2010
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • [no subject]
    A fair point--thanks for the correction.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Erica Naone
    01/27/2010
    Posts:49
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Battery life
    You mention here that that it has shorter battery life, which is likely. This is not a small problem for reading. The Kindle is good, but even the knowledge that a charge will be necessary, with an eye on the battery icon, is a distraction to the reading experience. I use a Kindle, but if it had a short battery life I wouldnt.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Matthew Putm...
    01/27/2010
    Posts:24
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • screen is better?
    Why do you say that the iPad's screen is better. I realize in general color is better than black and white. But for reading books isn't E-Ink superior?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    markadams44
    01/27/2010
    Posts:1
    • Re: screen is better?
      I think this is a matter of personal preference. I read a lot of books on my laptop and phone--I've got no particular attachment to E-ink. I like the vibrant color, and I think it will be nicer for reading magazines and newspapers.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      Erica Naone
      01/28/2010
      Posts:49
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • [no subject]
    Hardly a Kindle killer. Way too heavy to be a comfortable eReader. Battery life too limited. The iPad underwhelms me, but I live way outside the distortion field, so what do I know?

    Look for Pixel Qi displays to show up in an eReader. This is a more flexible display and should have better battery life. I consider 20 hours battery life a minimum standard. Two hours of reading a day gives you 10 days. I get that with 15 year old lcd, gray-scale technology and I find it adequate. Plus Pixel Qi screens give you an LCD eInk mode and the choice of a backlit LCD mode for people such as myself who read quite a bit in a low light environment where eInk just does not cut it. Asus is looking at an OLED display that may show promise, but I have yet to see it.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    dhartsoc
    01/28/2010
    Posts:2
  • Single Purpose
    I just got a Kindle for Christmas. I read a lot and was hesitant to switch from books to an electronic device. I love it and now read even more.

    The Kindle is a single purpose device and it performs that purpose well. The i-pad weighs too much and does not have the battery life for me to consider it as a book reader. With the built in cell connection it also costs three times the cost of a Kindle.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    parkbn
    01/28/2010
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • Battery scam.
    Seems like Apple made it its business model, to run the infamous battery scam on many of its devices.

    Users cannot access the battery, and the cost of replacement is around $100 or more.

    There are less hyped, but much better computers  and tablets out there. Do your homework!
    Rate this comment: 12345

    gabrielg01
    01/28/2010
    Posts:433
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Kindle is iToast, unless....
    The Kindle's survival depends on: (1) color touch screen (the reason I've waited so long and would gladly carry a pound of color over a few ounces of black and white); (2) 50%+ price cut; (3) features to compete with the iPhone.

    I've already got an iPhone 3GS and frankly, don't want another phone line. I'd gladly opt for a color Kindle at under $300 if it added a color touch screen of iPad's HD quality, allowed easy memory expansion and bluetooth communication to computers and PDAs, kept its cellular connection to download eBooks, and added a bunch of PDA presentation features (like the ability to project PowerPoint presentations to a wall or screen).

    Actually come to think of it, Kindle could turn the iPad into iToast if it launched an all-out iWar against Apple.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Netizen
    01/28/2010
    Posts:22
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Internet Browsing
    Interesting article. A great advantage of the iPad over the Kindle is the fast graphics. This makes internet browsing easy and  enjoyable. This is a plus for e-books because they can include lots of clickable web references, if necessary, a must for non-fiction. Why have internet connectivity if you can't browse? In this respect, I think the iPad will offer serious competition to the Kindle.

    Is it even worth mentioning all the iPhone apps that can not only work as is on the iPad but can also be easily converted for the larger screen by their developers? The Kindle is great if you're camping out in the woods and you won't be near an electrical outlet for a long time. And how often does that happen?

    In conclusion, let me say that the future of the iPad and similar competing products is very bright. As they increase in performance and functionality, they may become the primary computing devices for most people.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Mapou
    01/29/2010
    Posts:94
    Avg Rating:
    2/5

Log In

Advertisement
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology CyberMedia © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.