Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

TR Editors' blog

Insights, opinions, and our editors' analysis of the latest in emerging technologies.

Blog Topics

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

  • ... : Just sayin'. Related: News outlets use the same technique to create value-free "content" to match...
  • Phineas : your advice is that I put up a blog claiming the outcome of Charles B Rangel's ethics hearing and...
  • mattgroom : While we may not be able to transport the extra energy in our current wiring...why bother...  Use...
  • wctopp : You can now legally "jailbreak" an iPhone and use it on another network.  You cannot, however,...
  • luddite : Yes it makes perfect sense does'nt it. A company spends an inordinate amount of money developing...
Advertisement
Friday, February 26, 2010

Valley Entrepreneurs Vent Frustration at Department of Energy

Cleantech entrepreneurs urge Washington to make better use of Bay Area intellectual capital.
By Katherine Bourzac

At an event in downtown San Francisco on Tuesday, a representative of the Obama administration went before a gathering of Silicon Valley cleantech entrepreneurs to spread the good news about what's resulted from the stimulus package, and to get their feedback.

Peter Roehrig, a political appointee in the Department of Energy's office of energy efficiency and renewable energy, pointed to numbers released by the Congressional Budget Office that day suggesting that stimulus funding led to as many as 2.1 million jobs by the end of last year. The Department of Energy administrates $36.7 billion of the stimulus funds. Part of this, Roehrig noted, is going to a program to encourage energy-efficient retrofits for cities--a program being dubbed "cash for caulkers."

But the crowd at the "Meet the DOE" event at Nixon Peabody LLP on Tuesday didn't seem to agree that things were going so well, and used the Q&A session to vent their frustration about the lack of funding for energy startups. Several people asked why big, well-capitalized companies like DuPont and GM recieved funds while their start-ups can't get off the ground. Others noted that stimulus funding seemed to favor big companies, while on the other end the ARPA-E program favors very promising but less proven innovations; companies somewhere in the middle don't know where to turn. One man, representing a company developing an add-on for engines to make them fuel flexible, stood up with excitement as he told Roehrig that Washington needs to figure out a way to take better advantage of the intellectual capital concentrated in the Bay Area.

Roehrig, left to answer for the US government, took the criticism in his stride and deflected suggestions that all it takes is a grant writer and a lobbyist to win funding. Money for new energy technologies was indeed built into the stimulus package, he said, but all with the end of guaranteeing jobs--and bigger companies can make a better argument that they'll create jobs. Roehrig encouraged the companies to come to Washington to meet with DOE representatives personally, but no one seemed much comforted when he expressed that to help solve these problems, like everyone else in the room, he's hoping the economy improves.

Comments

  • Number of Jobs?
    Let's see now.  According to the horse's mouth www.recovery.org, the number of  Recovery Funded Jobs Reported by Recipients is 594,754.  One wonders where the other 1.5 million jobs are? The massive healthcare bill and cap and trade and much other legislation that will involve higher taxes colors the growth scenario very risky. 
    Rate this comment: 12345

    howiem
    03/01/2010
    Posts:10
    Avg Rating:
    2/5
  • Number of Jobs?
    Correction. That should read www.recovery.gov
    Rate this comment: 12345

    howiem
    03/01/2010
    Posts:10
    Avg Rating:
    2/5

Log In

Advertisement
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology CyberMedia © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.