Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Thin-Film Solar with High Efficiency

Solexant is printing inorganic solar cells with nanomaterials.

By Katherine Bourzac

Thursday, November 19, 2009

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Solar cells made from cheap nanocrystal-based inks have the potential to be as efficient as the conventional inorganic cells currently used in solar panels, but can be printed less expensively. Solexant, a company in San Jose, CA, is currently manufacturing solar cells to test the technology. In order to compete with other thin-film solar companies, Solexant is banking on simpler, cheaper printing processes and materials, as well as lower initial capital costs to build its plants. The company expects to sell modules for $1 per watt, with efficiencies above 10 percent.

Nanocrystal solar: The solar cells at top were made on a roll-to-roll printer from an ink consisting of the rod-shaped inorganic semiconducting nanocrystals shown below. The cells were printed on a flexible metal foil and will be topped with a glass plate.
Credit: Solexant

The company has licensed methods for growing nanocrystals and making them into inks from Paul Alivisatos, professor of nanotechnology at the University of California, Berkeley and interim director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. (Alivisatos is on Solexant's board of directors.) Alivisatos says the advantage of these materials is their potential to combine low cost with high performance. Solar cells made from crystalline silicon are efficient at converting sunlight into electricity, but they're expensive to manufacture. To bring down the cost, companies have been developing thin-film solar cells from semiconductors that don't match crystalline silicon's performance but are much less expensive to make.

Solexant's goal is to make cheap thin-film solar cells with relatively high efficiencies. It would not disclose what the nanoparticle inks are made of, but the company says they are suspensions of rod-shaped, semiconducting nanocrystals that are four nanometers in diameter and 20 to 30 nanometers long. The Solexant cells are printed on a metal foil as the substrate. Nanocrystal films are simple to print but have poor electrical properties. Electrons tend to get trapped between the small particles. "The trick with these cells is how to deposit the materials on the fly in a way that makes a very conductive surface," which in turn ensures decent light-to-electricity conversion, says Alivisatos. Solexant begins with nanocrystals because they're easier to print, and heats them as they're printed, causing them to fuse together into larger, high-quality microcrystals that don't have as many places for electrons to lose their way.

The remaining parts of the solar cell, including the electrical contacts and a light-absorbing layer, are also printed on the flexible metal films. This process allows Solexant to print very large areas. When complete, the cells are cut and then topped with a rigid piece of glass.

Making the entire cell using a roll-to-roll process gives the company an advantage over other thin-film photovoltaic companies that print on glass, which is heavier and limited to smaller areas, says Solexant CEO Damoder Reddy. "The cost benefit is dramatic, allowing us to produce cells for 50 cents a watt," he says. First Solar, a thin-film company that uses vacuum deposition to print its cells onto glass, has manufacturing costs of 85 cents per watt. Nanosolar, another company making nanocrystal solar cells, uses a different semiconductor that requires chemical reactions to take place during printing, which increases the complexity and expense of the process. "We print a preformed semiconductor," which eliminates such steps, says Reddy.

Story continues below

Solexant has raised $22.5 million in venture funding to build its two-megawatt pilot plant, and is seeking $40 million more over the next year to build a 100-megawatt facility. Solar startups typically seek about $250 million in capital to build such a plant, says Reddy.

The company's first product, which Reddy says will sell for $1 per watt next year, will contain a single layer of the nanocrystals. The company is currently developing other types of nanocrystals that are more responsive to different bands of the solar spectrum in the hopes of boosting its cells' efficiency. "Ultimately we want to make a multilayer, broad-spectrum cell," says Reddy.

Comments

  • proving durability
    that will be the challenge they have, as mono-crystalline at least has this going for it. But either way, it signals another step toward very cheap PV, putting the PPA model even closer to mainstream adoption. For a truly disruptive project, check out the open-source framework for  solar monitoring here:

    http://www.solarnetwork.net/
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jwgorman
    11/19/2009
    Posts:15
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Paint Application
    Does the printed panel have to be heated for the crystal to align?

    If no - can a paint product be developed to permit homeowners to paint their homes with a clear substrate product infused with nano-crystals and then rig up or tap the power feed from the home surface to feed the grid or Netmeter so the homeowner's power is paid for?

    A contractor with a good clean *nano-certified airless paint system could spray a home up in a matter of minutes and lower deployment costs.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    mkogrady
    11/19/2009
    Posts:287
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: Paint Application
      Just curious about PV paint.. does it pose a high risk of getting electrocuted by accidentally touching the wall that is coated with the paint?
      Rate this comment: 12345

      demunuts
      11/20/2009
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      1/5
  • Getting shocked?
    Any licensed installation by a contractor would have been designed and UL certified so it would not be a shock hazard.  An experimental system is not UL approved so it would be up to the person doing it to make it safe or inaccessable.  Of course PV cells in small numbers are pretty safe because the voltage is low.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    JustaGuess
    11/20/2009
    Posts:7
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
  • Similar to Nanosolar
    This sounded alot like nanosolar's printing process for solar panels. The materials are of course different, nanosolar CIGS and first solar CdTe

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nanosolar

    And as it turns out several execs worked for nanosolar first.

    It also sounds like first solar
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Solar
    which now has vast production facilities in several countries.

    Since they appear to be building a solar plant with the output, not only just selling the output, maybe this company will do better than nanosolar. 

    It appears nanosolar, which received the largest venture capital amount of any company in some recent years has a tire stuck in the mud and is only producing a tiny fraction of its plants rated capacities.  For whatever reason they are not in mass production, which seems strange as you'd think people would be beating down the doors to get cheap panels.  Maybe this is because of the competitors like first solar.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    erbium
    11/22/2009
    Posts:203
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Thin Film Solar Cells
    If someone developed PV films using concrete roof tiles as the mechanical substrate, the PV could demonstrate a some what lower efficiency. The large roof surface areas of southwest homes and buildings could produce substantial daytime power.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jack36
    11/25/2009
    Posts:1
  • CFCs anyone?
    I hate to be the uninformed  Joe, but the production of these (as well as other photo voltaic products) most likely requires toxic solvents. All I'm saying is, there are other ways. Dyesol uses benign materials to produce efficient PV products. Parallel CFCs when that process was commercialized and where it is now.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    underscore_r...
    11/26/2009
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
  • [no subject]
    Forget a big factory, tell me how to cook this stuff up at home and I can paint it on to some metal film I buy at home depot.
    LET US MAKE THE PANELS!!!
    Then we can save the world quicker, building big factories is a waste of time.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    jim123
    11/26/2009
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Auto surfaces?
    Would this stuff be appropriate to apply to the roof (or whole surface) of a car?  Too brittle? Voltage issues?

    Could really increase the range of a commuter car, especially in the desert West but also Florida, etc., that sits outside in the parking lot for eight hours each day, plus mal and street parking, etc. Could also power a small exhaust fan so the interior won't be 140 degrees when you get in the car.

    In this use, cost trade-offs would almost be secondary; though efficiency would by worth a premium.

    This sounds a step in that direction, given durability and at least moderate resistance to surface abrasion.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Reptile
    11/27/2009
    Posts:17
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Auto surfaces?
      applying solar cells would provide insignificant range boost to a car.

      It would also be prone to quick damage from driving at high speeds for prolonged periods.  And car washes, rain, hail, etc more so than just sitting on a roof.

      However your last idea is already in production.  some new (Prius I think?) hybrids have solar cells for one purpose, to power an exhaust fan.

      the hotter and sunnier  it is means the fan runs to keep cool.

      RVs often do this, also with solar panel to charge battery and power roof fans.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      erbium
      11/29/2009
      Posts:203
      Avg Rating:
      3/5

Resources

Events

Videos

Car Chargers Get Smart

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

Advertisement
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology CyberMedia © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.