Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

New Life for Magnetic Tape

A boost in storage density could keep tapes spinning for years.

By Duncan Graham-Rowe

Monday, January 25, 2010

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Music lovers may have long forsaken them, but magnetic tapes still reign supreme when it comes to storing vast amounts of digital data. And new research from IBM and Fujifilm could ensure that tape remains the mass storage medium of choice for years to come for at least a decade.

Tape deck: The read-write machine used to demonstrate a new magnetic tape technology developed by IBM and Fujifilm.
Credit: IBM Research Zurich

At IBM's Zurich Research Laboratories in Switzerland, researchers have developed a new tape material and a novel tape-reading technology. In combination, they can store 29.5 billion bits per square inch, which translates to a cartridge capable of holding around 35 terabytes of data--more than 40 times the capacity of cartridges currently available, and several times more than a hard disk of comparable size.

The researchers used a relatively new magnetic medium, called barium ferrite. In cooperation with researchers from Fujifilm's labs in Japan, they orientated the barium ferrite magnetic particles so that their magnetic fields protrude perpendicularly from the tape, instead of lengthways. This means that more bits can be crammed into a given area, and the magnetic fields are stronger. Furthermore, these particles allow thinner tape to be used, meaning12 percent more tape can be stored on a single spooled cartridge.

Increasing the density of data that can be stored on a tape makes it more difficult to reliably read information. This is already a problem because of electromagnetic interference and because the heads themselves will retain a certain amount of residual magnetism from readings. To overcome this, the IBM group developed new signal processing algorithms that simultaneously process data and predict the effect that electromagnetic noise will have on subsequent readings.

Hard disks can store more data on a given surface area than magnetic tape, and the data on a disk can be read faster. But because hundreds of meters of tape can be spooled on a single cartridge, the overall volumetric data density of tape is higher, says Evangelos Eleftheriou, head of the Storage Technologies group at IBM Zurich.

Crucially, tape storage is also much cheaper. "What's most important is the cost per gigabyte," says Eleftheriou. Solid state drives cost between $3 and $20 per gigabyte. In contrast, it costs less than a cent per gigabyte to store information on magnetic tape. In the third quarter of 2009, the global tape market was worth more than half a billion dollars.

Extending the life of magnetic tape technology could delay the arrival of new storage technologies, particularly holographic storage. Experimental holographic discs, which use patterns of light interference to hold multiple pieces of data at a single point, can already hold several hundred gigabytes of data. The technology is expected to eventually allow terabytes of data to be held on a disc.

Story continues below

"Tape still wins, but only at very high data volumes," says James Hamilton, a vice president and distinguished engineer on Amazon's Web services team, in Bellevue, WA. Tape is most suitable for "cold storage"--when data is not accessed frequently. But the volume of digital data that needs to be stored is increasing rapidly, so Hamilton says there's a real need to try to squeeze more out of tape.

It could take another five years before the new tape technology is ready for the market, Eleftheriou admits. "But we have shown that there is still at least another 10 years of life in it," he says.

Comments

  • Have you ever USED mag tape?
    Magnetic tape is an unsatisfactory storage medium at any density because it is one of the least reliable media.

    There are probably 2 reasons: (1) the tape gets flexed every time the tape is read, which damages the oxide layer a little bit every time, (2) when the tape is sitting in storage, each piece of tape is in close contact with regions having different magnetization patterns.

    But whatever the reason, the #1 requirement of a storage medium isn't density, it's RELIABILITY. For any data that matters, tape is a non-starter.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    Neil2009
    01/25/2010
    Posts:3
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Only half-right
      Reliability of tapes is certainly an issue.  Experienced users will regularly check tapes for readability; and modern equipment automatically monitors this and identifies tapes for replacement as required.  I wouldn't recommend tape for really long-term (decades) archival storage, but then most standard media have issues over such a long timescale.

      But I would argue that tape is a necessary part of any storage strategy (and will probably remain so for many years to come).  Disk replication is a great solution for disaster recovery, but can't (at a realistic cost) hold the multiple copies needed for archival recovery (i.e. when you need to return to the version of a file from 3 days/weeks ago).

      Other solutions based on CD/DVD technology don't currently match the speed of tape - and many organizations struggle to fit their backup activities into the narrowing timeslot available.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      chrisjmiller
      01/25/2010
      Posts:37
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
    • Re: Have you ever USED mag tape?
      I agree with what the comment of chrisjmiller, and would also like to add that so far the optic storage media have also fallen short in terms of reliability.

      There have been several reports floating around the web about the data loss phenomenon with these media and I have experienced it first hand a while ago when I transferred 100 CD/DVD backups to HD of only a few years old (mean=2years). About 30% were completely unreadable and in about 20% parts of the data were corrupted. So I don't want to imagine the data loss you'd get when a holo-disc fails, especially considering that more complex systems are generally less robust...

      I think the conclusion is that at this time we do not have a digital medium that can compare to the longevity achieved by old media like books and stone tablets... There is of course little incentive for companies to develop such a thing, but if we want to store our digital stuff for generations to come we need such a thing. Otherwise our civilisation will suffer from a general kind of amnesia, "forgetting" everything from 30 years ago.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      nanobody
      01/25/2010
      Posts:3
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
    • Re: Have you ever USED mag tape?
      Old tape technology never was reliable. However, using new generations of tape technology and the right processes, tape is more reliable than disk. (Some might say that doesn't mean much.) Anybody playing with huge quantities of data can attest to the new tape's reliability--for example, national research labs / NASA / Human Genome Project etc. rely heavily on tape.

      Over the last decade, tape reliability has improved 700%--important, because some of that old tape was a real nightmare. (DLT comes to mind, and AIT.) However, LTO-4 and enterprise drive technology such as the IBM jag drives, with the proper care and feeding, are so far the only viable (and yes, reliable) method of storing data for anything approaching the useful lifetime of most data. Accessing data from tape that's been stored for a long time does assume that the right drives and software to read the tape are available. Otherwise, migrating data up through tape generations, which is standard in very large data centers, is a another step to take. And LTO, for example, reads and writes back one generation, and reads two generations back, so having a few LTO drive generations in a single contemporary automated tape library keeps data plenty accessible.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      bethwalk
      02/26/2010
      Posts:1
  • if not tape, what now?
    So if tape isn't reliable, and optical disks aren't either, what should we use? I'm a librarian involved in some massive special collection digitization projects, expecting to need to store securely on the scale of maybe 20-50 TB of data "cold" (e.g. original high res scans) for decades. What's the best technology available today for us? We don't have the staffing to keep re-reading the cold storage media every couple of months or whatever to verify it.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    mbelvadi
    01/25/2010
    Posts:15
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re: if not tape, what now?
      Good question!  I think you should take advice from a specialist in the area (which I'm certainly not).  But you not only need to be concerned about the long-term viability of the medium, but also the technological ability to read it (and also understand the software format) decades hence.  I believe there are already data held on the old 'laser disks' for which it's difficult to find compatible hardware and reel-to-reel tapes are going the same way.

      On the positive side, a small number of bit errors in an image file are unlikely to be a visible problem, whereas the same is not the case for a file of (say) bank account data.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      chrisjmiller
      01/25/2010
      Posts:37
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
  • Cloud Storage anyone?
    With high speed connections now the norm for companies why not go cloud storage?

    I have to agree about tape. Its cheap, fast and easy. Not many a business would turn that down as a backup option no matter how short the life of tape is.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    matayp
    01/25/2010
    Posts:2
    Avg Rating:
    1/5
    • Re: Cloud Storage anyone?
      Cloud storage just shifts the requirements to someone and somewhere else.  Ultimately, the bits you want to store have to come to rest at some place, even if you offload it to another party.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      wrampart
      01/25/2010
      Posts:1
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
      • Re: Cloud Storage anyone?
        To my mind it would be a benefit storing backup data off site as this means you are unable to lose that tape/drive due to fire, theft or loss(on site). You also have the benefit of always on connections, your data streams constantly providing you with the most up to date data at the backup service. Yes your bits have come to rest elsewhere but from this perspective how is that a bad thing?
        Rate this comment: 12345

        matayp
        01/25/2010
        Posts:2
        Avg Rating:
        1/5
        • Re: Cloud Storage anyone?
          "To my mind it would be a benefit storing backup data off site as this means you are unable to lose that tape/drive due to fire, theft or loss(on site). "
          >then what happens to your data if there is a disaster at the offline backup place?  what if it is only in one location and flood/fire/earthquake/theft/ degradation of storage media then happens at the online backup?  (lightning strike after flood caves in roof for example) or theft of data centers computers as happend at major data center in chicago

          as the previous poster says, the 'bits still have to come to rest somewhere' and that somewhere still can have reliability problems.   just that somewere won't have the same unreliability problems you will 'on site' as you say.

          "You also have the benefit of always on connections, your data streams constantly providing you with the most up to date data at the backup service."
          >> what if disaster such as satellites going out of service (war, solar flare) or fiber trunk cut (dork with a backhoe) wipes out connectivity when you need it to the backup site?

          Yes your bits have come to rest elsewhere but from this perspective how is that a bad thing?
          >> this CAN be a bad thing if the bits are not WITH YOU and can't be reached when you need them.  You still need to plan redundancy rather than just presuming 'the cloud' is redundant and backed up.  This is similar to telecom redundancy planning.  you actually ask the multiple carriers about physical routes, locations, etc.
          Rate this comment: 12345

          erbium
          01/27/2010
          Posts:143
          Avg Rating:
          3/5
  • Dear Librarian,
    If its cold storage, tape is the way to go.  There is an consortium with IBM and HP and others supporting the same standard called LTO. Tape isn't going anywhere and you can bet that 20 years from now you will have the vendors supporting it.  Plus, its really affordable.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    sactinko
    01/27/2010
    Posts:1

Videos

Ultra-Efficient Gas Engine Passes Test

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

Advertisement
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology CyberMedia © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.