Hacked dash: Researchers have previously shown they can take control of a car’s dashboard display, among other systems.
Credit: Center for Automotive Embedded Systems Security
Computing
Taking Control of Cars From Afar
Researchers show they can hack into cars wirelessly.
- Monday, March 14, 2011
- By Erica Naone
Researchers who have spent the last two years studying the security of car computer systems have revealed that they can take control of vehicles wirelessly.
The researchers were able to control everything from the car's brakes to its door locks to its computerized dashboard displays by accessing the onboard computer through GM's OnStar and Ford's Sync, as well as through the Bluetooth connections intended for making hands-free phone calls. They presented their findings this week to the National Academies Committee on Electronic Vehicle Controls and Unintended Acceleration, which was brought together partly in response to last year's scandal over supposed problems with the computerized braking systems in Toyota Priuses.
The team, including Tadayoshi Kohno, an assistant professor of computer science at the University of Washington, and Stefan Savage, a professor of computer science at the University of California, San Diego, had previously shown that they could take control of a car's computer systems, provided that they had physical access to the vehicle's onboard diagnostics port—a federally mandated access point located under the dashboard in almost all modern cars.
With the new work, the researchers systematically analyzed ways they could get at a car's computer systems without having physical access. They used a 2009 mass-production sedan equipped with fewer computer systems than many high-end cars. For each attack that succeeded, they confirmed that they could take complete control of all of the car's internal computer systems.
The researchers attacked the car's Bluetooth system, which allows a driver to make hands-free cell-phone calls. They found a vulnerability in the way the Bluetooth system was implemented that allowed them to execute code to take control of the car. To do this, the researchers used a smart phone already paired with the car or found a way to illicitly authorize a new smart-phone connection.
Nowadays many cars come equipped with cellular connections that perform safety functions, such as automatically calling for help if the driver is in a crash. The researchers found that they could take control of this system by breaking through its authentication system. First, they made about 130 calls to the car to gain access, and then they uploaded code using 14 seconds of audio. The researchers also found other ways to gain access, for example via the car's media player.
"We were surprised to find that the attack surface was so broad," Kohno says, referring to the wide variety of ways the researchers were able to gain access to the car's computer systems.
The team analyzed possible attack scenarios as well. For example, they showed that high-tech car thieves could search for desired models of cars, identify their locations, and unlock them, all without any forced entry. They could conduct malicious surveillance, such as forcing a car to send out its GPS location at regular intervals. They could also sabotage a car, by disabling its brakes, for example.
- 1
- 2
mkogrady
425 Comments
- 798 Days Ago
- 03/14/2011
Alternate Hack - free music files that have been compromised
Is there evidence that anybody who has acquired music off the net and play it in their car's stereo can infect the car itself with an audio file that may have a trojan in it?
z0rr0
99 Comments
- 798 Days Ago
- 03/14/2011
"There is no evidence that any of these attack scenarios have been used by criminals"
The state actors, from the KGB to the CIA, are likely to exploit such holes far more effectively than criminals.
For criminals, the stolen hardware is the only benefit, and of course the obvious residual evidence.
For the real threat, the cars mean nothing, and any evidence will likely be untraceable.
MATR
94 Comments
- 798 Days Ago
- 03/14/2011
As per my comments on SMS messaging for so-called "Smart" phones... this is the exact same pattern. Manufacturers seem to be systematically providing products that are critical for our infrastucture with severe safety / security flaws. I also will refuse to purchase such devices until they are secured and therefore safe to use. What the real risk for all of the "Smart" devices is this: In a cyber warefare scenario, can one signal be sent to an entire country to cause every car to have the brakes turn off, and the accelerator jump to maximum? It would seem so. That, in my mind, is the catestrophic risk that the manufacturers through negligence (or otherwise) have placed us. If even 10% of the cars on the road during rush hour respond to that signal it would cause the entire road system to sieze up and freeze to a grinding halt. Just saying ... maybe "Smart" really isn't all that smart after all.
MATR
94 Comments
- 777 Days Ago
- 04/04/2011
Case in point...
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20110404/bs_nm/us_citi_capitalone_data
MATR
94 Comments
- 776 Days Ago
- 04/05/2011
Related to my general point...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-10912376
MATR
94 Comments
- 761 Days Ago
- 04/20/2011
Case in point, again... this time we find out that the "Smart" Phone (iPhone) is recording everywhere the "Smart" owner goes...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/apr/20/iphone-tracking-prompts-privacy-fears
Now, please couple this with the fact that the "Smart" Phones are vulnerable to hackers.
Now please consider the logical potential consequences of that setup.
Now please reconsider whether or not the owner of the "Smart" Phone is really all that smart after all. Guess what? Not really.
If the public was not so high on the idea of being "Smart" they might actually behave smart by refusing to purchase the glitzy and dangerous new devices until the manufacturer stopped making their customers increasingly vulnerable to every new form of attack concievable. Just a thought.
MATR
94 Comments
- 655 Days Ago
- 08/04/2011
Another case in point... this one far more serious than anything having to do with smart phone hacking, but illustrates the absolute and total neglegence that has infected the IT industry at large:
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/energy-plants-risk-cyber-attacks-researcher-034845735.html
The fact is that these issues were completely and totally predictable, and are being predicted as major threats now. When the threat is finally realized some people will act as though it's all some sort of amazing surprise and they couldn't possibly have known that it could ever happen. These are the same people who sat at the meeting where the engineer said, "You know, I don't think that attatching PLCs that control the machinery to the Internet is necessarily such a safe thing to do," and his manager replied "You're always such a worry wart. This will make life much easier. I hear what you're saying but I don't think we should be too concerned about the security issues just now."
Yup.
And then there was a big Ka-boom.
MATR
94 Comments
- 578 Days Ago
- 10/20/2011
Another Case in Point...
http://www.networkworld.com/community/blog/skype-exploits-i-know-where-you-are-what-you-
This time our fantastically well thought out ultra-convenience Internet Applications for Scype, and P2P offer hackers an extraordinary and easy to use means by which to conduct stalking and blackmail operations on us. Yup. So great.
One might notice that the major culprit in this case is non other than Microsoft. Darth Vendor strikes again.







SirLanse
71 Comments
cheap research
"One guy in garage" no, but how much would it cost an organized theft ring to get the research from the lab assistant or unpaid graduate intern?
Are the plans online? Do they have a YouTube video of them doing it? Can you buy the tools from a russian website? I am not buying a new car with that crap built into it!
Call me Admiral Adama!
Reply