Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

« Back 1 2 3 [4]

This discussion relates to Technology Review's article The Real Price of Obama's Cap-and-Trade Plan .

Discussions: Business: The Real Price of Obama's Cap-and-Trade Plan


  • beegdawg007

    Posts:
    3
    Avg Rating:
    5/5
    03/10/2009 10:20 PM

    crap and trade...

    Cap and Trade is a bad solution for a problem which does not even exist!!!!

    The current global CO2 hysteria is the silliest and saddest thing I have ever witnessed. Ths is Global hysteria over nothing.  CO2 is "GOOD" not bad - plants love Co2.  I am an Engineer, but the math necessary to see through this could be done by a 10th grader.  I am not alone in my thoughts on this.  31,000 U.S. Scientists (9,000 PHDs) have signed the petition at this link.  Basically it says "stop the nonsense.. "

    http://www.oism.org/pproject/

    There are similar activities now in other parts of the world like Japan and Australia.

    Here's what we know...

    1.The amount of CO2 "now" in the atmosphere is 385 ppm.  To picture this, imagine our atmosphere being represented by a room filled with 10,000 tennis balls.  Currently less than 4 of those 10,000 tennis balls would represent the Co2 now in the atmosphere.  At least 3 of the tennis balls representing the CO2 in our room of 10,000 were put there by mother nature.  Man has added, at most, the equivalent of 1 out of 10,000 tennis balls worth of CO2 in the past 150 years.  If we keep going at this rate, we may add another 1 in the next 100 years. The plants of the earth are cheering us on because they absolutely love CO2.  During the Triassic and Jurassic periods, perhaps the most lush period of time ever on planet earth, CO2 levels were 3 to 4 times greater than they are now.

    2. Global warming (caused by solar activity) causes atmospheric CO2 to increase, not the other way around.  This can be proven with the simplest of experiments.  93% of the CO2 on earth is locked up in water.  In the oceans, CO2 exists as both compressed CO2(at the surface) and carbonic acid in the deeper ocean. Submarine vulcanization has been spewing CO2 in the ocean since the oceans begining billions of years ago.  Warm water holds less of both types of CO2.  As the water warms, CO2 is released baci into the atmosphere.  Just fill a glass with cold tap water and measure the PH.  Let it warm and measure the PH again.  The PH will have gone up (less acidic) because CO2 has left the water which will have slightly reduced the amount of carbonic acid. FYI, carbonic acid is what makes soda pop fizz!

    3. The earth has gotten colder every year since 1998, not warmer.  The warming period which Al Gore likes to site for the past 150 years is simply a totally normal cycle which came about as we exited a colder period, following the little ice age, which followed the Midevel warming period.  On a temperature chart of thee past 3,000 years, the earth is exactly at the normal point right now.

    4. Plants love CO2. The more CO2 the more plants. More plants remove more CO2.  The earth is a natural carbon sequestation system.  The amount of CO2 exchanged between the atmosphere, the ocean and the land, absolutely dwarf the wee bit being added annually by mankind.

    5. And as for the ocean rising.. it is.. and it has been rising at an average rate of about 2 ft per century for the past 18,000 years. Just 12,000 years ago, men and animals walked from mainland Europe to the British Isles.  Scientists who measure these things, claim the ocean level has increased 120 Meter in the last 18,000 years.  Our problem really is that we put most of our cities in the wrong places. 

    6. The correlation between solar activity and rising earth surface temperatures is almost perfect.

    Some of the people who visit sites like this and who believe themselves to be objective and analytical need to do some real independant research. I've read every bit of the argument put forth by Al Gore's team and I have watche his video.  However, I am yet to discuss this with anyone who believes this Al Gore junk science who has actually paid any attention to the arguments which hundreds of scientists make which prove that most of Al Gores junk science is but childish fantasy.  FYI, I have absolutely nothing at all to do with any part of the energy industry. I am a Civil Engineer who builds roads. But, facts are facts. Those who do just a wee bit of research will discover that scientists througout the world are now starting to speak out against the rampant environmental Nazism that is going on. 

    The entire CO2 hypothesis is but a myth which has been created by a junk science video.  Just look at the recent ruling of the British High court about the nine gross misrepresentations in Al Gores video project! 
    Rate this comment: 12345

  • JasonBourne

    Posts:
    3
    03/12/2009 05:09 PM

    Another Disaster in the Wings

    Years ago the budget for atmospheric sciences was 180 million dollars per year. Today it's 2 billion dollars per year. Now I understand why the IPCC and the so called scientists build their models on the assumption that global warming is occurring.  Just because Al Gore said so doesn't make it true. Unfortunately for these scientists, the models don't explain the data.

    Too many are more concerned about capturing a piece of Obama's pie with proposals for reducing CO2 in our atmosphere rather than finding the real cause of climate change and determining whether or not it poses any real threat to our environment.

    I’ve heard too much from Hollywood, the media, and Al Gore that changes in the CO2 concentration in our atmosphere is the cause of Global Warming. 

    Unfortunately, our government leaders are not scientists and are, more often than not, willing to distract us from the real issues at hand by suggesting there is greater doom elsewhere.  This, in turn, further feeds the media to no good end.

    CO2 levels never made any sense as the engine driving climate change. CO2 makes up about .038% of our Earth’s atmosphere and man’s contribution is something on the order of 3%.  So, man’s contribution to the increase in the concentration of CO2 is 0.001%.

    How can anyone believe that by eliminating 0.001% of a problem that it could have any measurable effect on the problem.

    CO2 is not toxic, it is not an effective GHG, and it is necessary to support plant life on this planet. Higher concentrations of CO2 in our atmosphere is probably beneficial.

    The amount of CO2 dissolved in the Earth's oceans depends on the ocean's temperature. The thermal time constant for the oceans is hundreds of years which explains the time lag between changes in atmospheric temperature and changes in the concentration of CO2.  Al Gore’s time scale is so large when he tries to show a correlation between CO2 levels and atmospheric temperature that the hundreds of years time lag is difficult, if not impossible, to see. And yes, CO2 concentration LAGS atmospheric temperature.  This one fact alone removes all support for Al Gore's theory of Global Warming.

    Water vapor is more likely the culprit. It comprises 95% of Earth's greenhouse gasses and is an effective GHG.  The only problem with it is that the people are not dumb enough to believe that a government could do anything about it. Maybe the next generation will buy into this nonsense.   

    Global Warming allowed the Vikings to grow tomatoes in northern Canada and the English to create a wine industry much to the dismay of the French.  And the Earth cooled off on its own quite nicely without any help from government.

    Before anyone charges off on some grandiose engineering project to reduce or eliminate net CO2 emissions at great expense of taxpayer dollars, more time should be spent on understanding the real reasons for climate change to begin with, especially by those who still believe CO2 is the culprit.

    Al Gore wins the Nobel Prize.  Big deal.  So did the guy who invented the lobotomy.


    The Man-made Global Warming Hoax (Part 1)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpWa7VW-OME&feature=related

    The Man-made Global Warming Hoax (Part 2)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpX-Kae00s8&feature=related

    The Man-made Global Warming Hoax (Part 3)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2BJrdSRDVlQ&feature=related

    The Man-made Global Warming Hoax (Part 4)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rf6C0cMq3RU&feature=related

    The Man-made Global Warming Hoax (Part 5)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkSmdaLkd60&feature=related

    The Man-made Global Warming Hoax (Part 6)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlSSwErKWQs&feature=related

    The Man-made Global Warming Hoax (Part 7)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efxToyX5cPw&feature=related

    The Man-made Global Warming Hoax (Part 8)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGZ1bHo6jR0&feature=related
    Rate this comment: 12345

  • rhansing

    Posts:
    63
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    03/12/2009 05:53 PM

    cap and trade issues.

    I realize that this will not be popular with some.

    1. No one has asked the question "is global warming necessarily bad? Look at it this way, first the death rate in winter is 10 times the death rate in summers.

    2. Man is more able to tolerate and adapt to 120 degrees than cold.

    3. Benefits of global warming will open the perma frost to agriculture. (northern Canada and Siberia) but this will be the best from land in the world which could feed millions.

    4.Can we really change Nature? is it not best to adapt, which is what the living creatures have been doing since the beginning of life?
    5. Yes the costal areas will flood, and Florida will be a series of islands, etc, adapt, move inland.

    6. Computer models are horribly inaccurate. For example, in 1987, computer models showed that within ten years, every hospital bed in the country would be occupied by an AIDS patient.

    7. Maybe the western states will become an oasis, whose to say?

    8. It's false to say that the short term drought that occurred in the last ten years in the west, is due to increased co2. Correlation does not imply causality. (medicine makes that mistake all the time.)

    9.  Computer models show that that we are due for an ice age. Hence, global warming will prevent half of Europe and Canada from being buried in ice.

    10. We can't stop hurricanes, tornados, earthquakes… we can only adapt.
    Yes, we are getting better in predicting, but to predict a tornado is much simpler than the unlimited variation influences computer models attempt to solve.

    11. Governments invariably make poor decisions. Look at the ethanol mandate,… and if you are old enough, you will remember the Soviet five year programs, and China's great leapt forward.

    The basic problem is that there are so many variables that computer models can be skewed by agenda driven beliefs. In Physics and Chemistry, controlling an experiment, is relatively simple compared to medicine with the very broad range of human variation. Most of the scientific articles in medicine, have serious flaws.

    And even worse and more difficult to control is "social science:", which is like global warming  almost impossible to control with our current knowledge. ( One can only control social experiments if one can controls the social and individual psychic of the individuals involved,  thus, the results are meaningless and agenda driven, and darn right dangerous.)

    Be careful what you wish for.

    Lastly, This does not mean that I am against energy conservation… if the cost vs benefit calculations are feasible. Carbon caps would be prohibitive expensive, and counter productive at this point in time.

    Ron Hansing

    Rate this comment: 12345

« Back 1 2 3 [4]

Videos

How to Redesign Life

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

Advertisement
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology CyberMedia © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.