Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Silicon Microwires Could Have a Sunny Future

Continued from page 1

By Phil McKenna

Thursday, January 07, 2010

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Another potential problem that LaPierre thinks may inhibit higher efficiencies is the electron transport capacity of the wires. When photons of sunlight are captured by a wire, they produces electrons that must then escape from the material to produce an electric current. Electrons, however, are easily trapped along the surface of the wires, reducing their overall efficiency. Thin-film solar cells have to overcome this challenge as well, but the problem is especially acute in thin wire cells because they have a much larger surface area per volume than planar films.

The wires that Lewis and colleagues grew, however, are 1.6 micrometers in diameter, three orders of magnitude thicker than typical solar cell nanowires. The thicker microwires have a lower surface area to volume ratio that, according to modeling conducted by the group, boosts the electron transport capacity of the wires.

Matthew Beard, a senior scientist at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, CO, says the relatively high surface area of the wires could be a plus for converting solar power into hydrogen fuel. The high surface area and low cost of raw materials of the silicon microwires means they could be used directly as electrodes to hydrolyze water into hydrogen.

Still, Beard says microwire solar technology will have a tough time competing as a source of power against currently available thin films that are relatively inexpensive and already achieve 10 to 12 percent efficiencies. But Beard adds that silicon, the raw material for the wires, is more readily available than metals such as cadmium and telluride that make up today's most efficient thin films. "This technology has a long way to go, but potentially can compete, as silicon is more abundant than those materials and potentially cheaper," he says.

Comments

  • More silicon solutions
    Ultimately, it is the silicon solutions that will win the competition to bring vast PV resources online. Thin-film and multi-junction options rely too heavily on rare elements.

    Good research into new silicon technologies only helps. I wonder why we haven't heard as much about sliver technology and other means to dramatically reduce the silicon needed to produce similar amounts of electricity.

    (By the way, telluride is not a metal, but tellurium is.)
    Rate this comment: 12345

    MakeSense
    01/10/2010
    Posts:99
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Sorry to quibble but
    "simply increasing the packing fraction to 15 to 20 percent will result in a fourfold increase in efficiency"

    Ahem, going from 4% to 20% is a *five-fold" increase people. 
    Rate this comment: 12345

    aarontco
    01/10/2010
    Posts:10
    Avg Rating:
    4/5
    • Re: Sorry to quibble but
      Sorry to quibble, aarontco, but actually the increase is the net of the max less the min, i.e. 20 - 4 = 16, which being 4x the min yields a four-fold increase.

      I rankle whenever I see this common mistake repeated, especially by such seemingly educated persons in the media, in government, etc.

      By the way, are you by chance an analyst for one of the banks which having been bailed out once are asking for more lest they fail (again)?

      In the words of the great American philosopher, Jeff Foxworthy, "Are you smarter than a 5th grader?"

      Best regards,

      Maurice
      Rate this comment: 12345

      maurice.7709...
      01/15/2010
      Posts:2
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
      • Re: Sorry to quibble but
        What you just wrote makes no sense.
        if a thing is 4 and you increase to 20, that is 5 fold.
        By definition - doubling is 2 fold, triple is 3 fold, quadruple is 4 fold, quintuple is 5 fold.
        Where did you get your definition?

        Rate this comment: 12345

        dcard88
        02/11/2010
        Posts:2
        Avg Rating:
        5/5
  • [no subject]
    The efficiency in question is incoming-light/out-going-electrons.

    The packing fraction is the density of wires on the surface.

    Apples & Oranges
    Rate this comment: 12345

    CaneT0ad
    01/14/2010
    Posts:1
    • Re: efficiencies
      May I ask, is not the conversion efficiency a ratio of out-going energy / incoming energy, i.e.
      out-going electrons / incoming light. I think CanT0ad may have stated the inverse of this.

      CanT0ad's ratio > 1 because incoming > outgoing. This ratio is always < 1, or else we have discovered the perpetual motion machine.

      He is correct that the conversion efficiency ought not be confused with the wire density.

      They are indeed apples and oranges, but not totally unrelated.  The electrons are the product which are processed and flow through the wire-pipeline. 

      It would seem correct to anticipate a cause and effect relationship, i.e. to expect that greater wire densities capturing greater quantities of light energy would produce greater quantities of electrons. 

      Whether this is a one to one relationship or not is of great import. We should follow this with great interest and keep it out of the hands of GE and other conglomerates who could bury it in archives, like the electric car they designed for NYC over a decade ago.

      It would also be interesting to compare the concept to the Frankel Prism array which converts light into electrons.  The emf is converted into laser energy, which beams have been transmitted across 60 mile distances near sea level, caught by antenna.  These beams can be re-converted into emf for transmission and distribution through a grid.

      Where are T Boone Pickens, "Oliver Warbucks" if I ever saw him, and his tribe to fund this research and development?

      Keep it out of the hands of GE and the like or it will be buried.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      maurice.7709...
      01/15/2010
      Posts:2
      Avg Rating:
      5/5

Videos

Car Chargers Get Smart

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

Advertisement
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology CyberMedia © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.