Battery test: Immersed in a potassium nitrate electrolyte, an electrode made of a copper- and iron-based nanomaterial could lead to low-cost batteries for grid storage.
Credit: Colin Wessells, Stanford University

Energy

In Search of the Ideal Grid Battery

Researchers at Stanford make an electrode that can be recharged 40,000 times without losing much capacity.

  • Tuesday, November 22, 2011
  • By Prachi Patel

Energy utilities are increasingly looking for batteries that can help stabilize the grid. By quickly storing and delivering charge, batteries could accommodate fluctuations in supply and demand, and help to incorporate variable sources of power such as wind and solar. However, currently available battery technologies are either too expensive or don't last for enough charge cycles to be practical.

Researchers at Stanford University have now demonstrated a high-efficiency new nanomaterial battery electrode that lasts for 40,000 charge cycles without significantly losing its charge-holding capacity. The work was led by Yi Cui, a materials science and engineering professor at Stanford University. Cui says the electrode is a first step toward a new type of low-cost battery suitable for storing large amounts of electricity within the power grid.

Cui's new battery chemistry uses inexpensive, abundant materials. It relies on the same principle employed in lithium-ion batteries—moving sodium or potassium ions between electrodes during charging and discharging—but does it much more cheaply. "For grid storage, the battery can be huge, and using sodium and potassium is very attractive because they are so abundant and cheap," Cui says. These batteries will use water-based electrolytes that are cheaper and easier to use than organic solvent-based electrolytes used in lithium-ion batteries.

The new electrodes, demonstrated in a paper posted online today in the journal Nature Communications, are also based on commonly available materials. The researchers start with the pigment Prussian Blue, an iron and cyanide compound. They replace half the iron with copper, and make crystalline nanoparticles of the resulting compound, which they coat on a cloth-like carbon substrate. Then they immerse this electrode in a potassium nitrate electrolyte solution.

The electrodes maintain 83 percent of their charge capacity after 40,000 cycles—in comparison, lead-acid batteries last a few hundred cycles, while lithium-ion batteries typically last for 1,000. The electrodes also show 99 percent energy efficiency. "You want the voltage you put in during charging and the voltage you take out during discharge to be same," Cui says. "Compared to any other battery material, this is absolutely the best."

Jay Whitacre, a professor of materials science and engineering at Carnegie Mellon University and founder of the sodium-ion battery startup Aquion Energy in Pittsburgh, says that the electrodes show good cycle life, but notes that their charge capacity is relatively low: 60 milliampere-hours per gram of material, compared to 100 for Aquion's manganese oxide cathode. Besides, he says, "it's based on copper, which is actually pretty expensive these days."

However, the most important metric for large-scale grid storage is price per unit of energy per cycle, says Donald Sadoway, a materials science and engineering professor at MIT. In that respect, the new material, with its tens of thousands of cycles, could have an edge over other batteries. "In the end, it comes down to the cost," he says. "If they can deliver this performance at a cost that's substantially lower than sodium-sulfur, they've got a winner here."

Other than cost and cycle life, "round-trip energy efficiency is also very important for grid energy storage so that you're not wasting energy during recharging," says Christopher Johnson, a battery researcher at Argonne National Laboratory. While the cost of the new electrode isn't known, its efficiency and cycle life "are impressive," he says. The researchers still need to demonstrate a full battery cell with two electrodes, though, which could change the numbers, Johnson adds.

The electrode made so far acts as a cathode. Cui says his team is tuning the chemistry of the material to make an anode and is working on making prototype batteries.

Related Articles

New Battery Could Be Just What the Grid Ordered

A Pittsburgh company says its battery has the long life and cheap cost needed to be practical for energy storage.

Startup's Battery Could Provide Cheaper Grid Storage

The key is a modular design, which could make the technology practical as a way to keep the grid stable and reduce electricity costs.

Subway Trains to Generate Power for the Grid

A battery will capture power from braking trains.

Close Comments

To comment, please sign in or register

Forgot my password

kbillet

60 Comments

  • 546 Days Ago
  • 11/22/2011

Now you see it, Now you don't

An energy solution.
This may be the last time we hear reports on this technology.  Label me a skeptic, but the energy |&or| Auto czars will either discredit this or buy it and hide it in a safe place.
It's all about money, not about doing the right thing!

How many times do I see articles similar to this, that just disappear.  We seem to have very few breakthroughs! Hum . . makes me wonder!

Best Regards,

Reply

R Sweeney

72 Comments

  • 546 Days Ago
  • 11/22/2011

Re: Now you see it, Now you don't

Yes, it's all about money.

Right now, dispatchers at electric companies all over the world are trying to figure out how to keep YOUR lights on for the least cost.

And a really cheap to use storage system would make their jobs ever so much easier, and actually reduces costs and increase profits by absorbing excess low-cost power when available and releasing it when needed.

What shadowy forces do you think are OPPOSED to the cheap and reliable storage of power? It's not the power companies.

Reply

unitedelectric

13 Comments

  • 545 Days Ago
  • 11/23/2011

Re: Now you see it, Now you don't

This logic is tiresome. I hear it about every possible advance involving energy. You point to profit motive but fail to see that any incremental advantage in efficiency of process or delivery involved in energy represents profit. In short, if it is real, the big boys will be all over it. There are no magical technologies. No magic bullets and no free lunch. Most of these advances are academic in nature. Perhaps this technology has something to contribute. Perhaps it doesn't.

Reply

Curt2004

90 Comments

  • 545 Days Ago
  • 11/23/2011

Re: Now you see it, Now you don't

This will have no effect on the auto industry, so why bring them into it.  As for the energy industry, they can't afford the cost/publicity of grabbing every new technology that comes out.  They also can't predict any better than others which will succeed and which won't.

Reply

shomas

246 Comments

  • 544 Days Ago
  • 11/24/2011

Re: Now you see it, Now you don't

kbillet you will never see this stuff in an auto battery.

At 60 milliampere-hours per gram for just the cathode makes it utterly worthless for an Electric Vehicle (EV). If the both the electrolyte and anode each weighed the same as the cathode, and the produced 1.5V per cell, then 1 ton of batteries made from this stuff could only store 30 kilowatt hours. It waste too much energy to hall several tons of these batteries to only drive a few miles. Do not forget the extra weight of a beefed up frame designed to carry enough of these batteries in an electric vehicle.

It may have potential as a grid storage battery, if after finding a suitable anode that also last 40,000 cycles the cost per kilowatt per kilocycle is lower then competing technologies.

You may have seen many different stories on new battery electrodes while not seeing a lot of them in production because of weight, material cost, and where an electrode may last many cycles, its counter electrode may not.

Reply

ricardokramer

12 Comments

  • 545 Days Ago
  • 11/23/2011

Ships and trains

Something like that could be good enough to be used in short haul ferry boats and diesel/electric freight trains.
You could retrofit a diesel ferry boat with an electric motor and at every stop drive a small truck inside with a fully charged battery on the trunk that would be connected to the ferry. On the way back  you drive the truck out and recharge it while you have another charged truck entering the boat.
The same can be applied in freight trains. The batteries can be stored in container wagons that are directly connected to the electric motor of the locomotives.
It would certainly cut costs for freight companies. CP Rail spend 500 million dollars a year in diesel alone.
And talking about CO2, you can always use wind to charge those batteries on off peak time.

Reply

shomas

246 Comments

  • 544 Days Ago
  • 11/24/2011

Re: Ships and trains

this stuff would not work in either application because of weight. A one ton battery (composed of an electrolyte, anode and this stuff as its cathode), may produce only 30 kilowatt hours or 40 horse power for an hour. That is barely enough HP to drive my little ford ranger that incidentally could not carry a 2,000 load.

Ok, so you could add more batteries. 150 tons of batteries could give you the needed 6,000 hp for an hour or 300 tons for two hours.  150 tons of batteries could be split over 5 40' shipping containers with 30 tons to each container. Each container adds 7,800 lbs and totals another 19.5 tons not counting the rail carts weight, just to go an hour.

Reply

Anumakonda

168 Comments

  • 545 Days Ago
  • 11/23/2011

Long life Battery

A major breakthrough in battery technology by Stanford Researchers which gives long life to rechargeable grid batteries without losing capacity. Congratulations.

Dr.A.Jagadeesh  Nellore(AP),India
E-mail: anumakonda.jagadeesh@gmail.com

Reply

art00

1 Comment

  • 538 Days Ago
  • 11/30/2011

batteries

Hey Prachi! I have a suggestion, kinetic storage.
Works great for the Cosmos, also works for Con Ed
in Manhattan. Mini flywheels in tractor trailers to handle large power spikes. Scale it up....

Reply

mliittsc

3 Comments

  • 533 Days Ago
  • 12/05/2011

Re: batteries

...or use wind power to pump water into an elevated reservoir, then just tap it hydroelectrically. Doesn't even have to be freshwater. If you close the system you could use the same water indefinitely. Don't have to worry about friction, etc.

Reply

Sagentialtd

3 Comments

  • 537 Days Ago
  • 12/01/2011

Perhaps more use in energy harvesting?

The team at Stanford have achieved an impressive result: 40,000 recharge cycles, much more than existing technology. However, we are unconvinced that grid energy storage is the best application for their work. Instead, we suggest they turn their attention to energy harvesting, where the life of the rechargeable battery is often the limiting factor in the lifetime of the device that uses the harvested energy. Using their technology for energy harvesters could enable wireless sensors to operate autonomously for decades, leading to far wider sensor deployment in industry, in cities, in healthcare, and potentially many other sectors.
Jeremy Bickerstaffe
Consultant
Sagentia Ltd

Reply

Advertisement

Special Reports

Innovators Under 35: India

2012 India TR35

The INDIA TR35 list recognizes outstanding innovators under the age of 35 for their continuing work in India that has the highest impact locally and globally. We highlight innovators in India whose work--spanning medicine, computing, communications, electronics, nanotechnology, and more--is changing our world. See this year's list of winners.

View All Special Reports

Advertisement
Advertisement