Technology Review - Published By MIT
Advertisement

Several IE Flaws Could Add Up to a Big Problem

A security expert shows how some small flaws could give a hacker access to personal files.

By Erica Naone

Friday, February 12, 2010

smaller text tool iconmedium text tool iconlarger text tool icon

Internet Explorer is the world's most popular browser, but that doesn't mean it's impregnable--security experts have recently drawn attention to how attackers could exploit it to spy on users. Last month, a vulnerability in Internet Explorer was implicated in Chinese hackers' attacks on Google. Microsoft quickly patched the flaw with a special security update, but not much later, Jorge Luis Alvarez Medina, a security consultant for Boston-based CORE Security Technologies, revealed a scheme that could let an attacker read any file on a user's computer through Internet Explorer.

Credit: Technology Review

In a talk last week at Black Hat DC, a computer-security conference in Washington, DC, Medina outlined how he built a series of seemingly minor flaws into a much more serious attack. Usually, files stored on a user's computer are treated differently from those intended to be accessible through the Internet. Medina's attack blurs the line between the two types of files, allowing an attacker to access personal files over the Internet. During his talk, Medina demonstrated code that allowed him to upload files from a user's computer.

To make the attack work, the Internet Explorer user has to click a link to a malicious Web page. Once the user navigates there, the attacker uses a variety of holes and features in Internet Explorer to gather information about the user's computer. At the same time, the attacker sneaks some malicious code into the browser (websites are allowed to write some code into the browser, for example in the form of tracking files called "cookies"). The attacker uses what he's learned to direct the browser to open that malicious code as if it originated from the user's computer. If he can convince the browser to run the code, then the attacker will have crossed the divide between the Internet and the user's local machine.

Story continues below

Medina has been investigating this type of attack for some time--CORE Security issued an advisory on his first version of this attack in 2008. However, he says, Microsoft has responded by releasing patches that focus only on preventing the browser from actually running the malicious code--the fixes don't stop the attacker from learning about the user's computer, which could, potentially, lead to other attacks. Medina believes the attack could be stopped more effectively by closing down flaws at all points of the chain. "It makes no sense to think about this vector if none of the [string of exploits] are possible," Medina says.

Comments

  • firefox
    The solution is simple. Don't use IE. Use Firefox or any other browser that suits your needs. But boycott the monopoly-based, path-of-least-resistance choice. Make Microsoft open up or vanish.
    Rate this comment: 12345

    vnedovic
    02/12/2010
    Posts:9
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • [no subject]
    Believe me, I love when things go bad for Microsoft.  But, how does anyone REALLY know that Firefox, Safari, Chrome, and Opera are any better?  If IE share drops, won't clever, sociopathic a**holes figure out ways to attack my computer through those browsers, too?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    mwilson1962
    02/12/2010
    Posts:29
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
    • Re:
      As long as IE remains the predominant browser and provides fertile fields of vulnerability, the digital vermin will choose to continue feeding from the uSoft trough.
      At least with open source browsers, if you are sufficiently technically sophisticated, you can analyze the code for vulnerabilities, and even contribute to correcting them. As with any type of security, publicly documented (and so widely analyzed) schemes tend to be more secure than proprietary ones (which often end up relying on security by obscurity).
      Rate this comment: 12345

      ms
      02/12/2010
      Posts:171
      Avg Rating:
      4/5
    • Re:
      To start with, none of them have ActiveX.  In addition, all the Open Source ones (Firefox, for example) have code that can be inspected for holes.  Finally, as many are cross-platform, it, they are not so tied into the OS - and thus less vulnerable.
      Rate this comment: 12345

      jjs
      02/12/2010
      Posts:25
      Avg Rating:
      5/5
  • IE Flaws
    What concerns me is the use of IE in the military and infrastructure companies.  The chinese seem to be exploiting MS software to hack, Google, state government sites (Iowa) and who knows what else.  What if there were an invasion of the US and the invader was able to drop the power grid for example.  Is anyone really thinking about this?
    Rate this comment: 12345

    CDShaffer
    02/12/2010
    Posts:1
    Avg Rating:
    3/5
  • Actually, it is the Chinese
    who are the most vulnerable, for the simple reason that the dominant browser version there remains IE6, which accounts for some 60 % of the market according to StatCounter's statistics (http://preview.tinyurl.com/yg4dpes ). If Chinese users - whether private, business, or government - are to protect themselves from being hacked, they are going to devote a great deal of effort to dropping this out-dated and flawed browser and going over to a more secure product....

    Henri
    Rate this comment: 12345

    mhenriday
    02/14/2010
    Posts:9
    Avg Rating:
    3/5

Videos

Car Chargers Get Smart

Log In

Forgot your password?     Register »
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to Technology Review's e-mail update. Enter your e-mail address

Advertisement
Advertisement
MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology CyberMedia © 2010 Technology Review. All Rights Reserved.